Context and reactions

Donald Trump’s Davos remarks questioned NATO’s record in Afghanistan, claiming allies “stayed a little back” as the US carried the burden. NATO invoked Article 5 after 9/11; British forces served with American and allied troops, and 457 UK personnel died. The comments sparked cross-party backlash in Westminster and underscored enduring tensions in transatlantic defence policy as leaders weigh the alliance’s future role.

Downing Street response

A PM spokesperson said: The president was wrong to diminish the role of NATO troops, including British forces, in Afghanistan. The statement stressed the sacrifice of 457 British service personnel and reaffirmed commitment to collective security. There were no immediate plans to summon the US ambassador; details would be handled through usual channels.

Opposition and defence voices

Lib Dem defence spokesperson James MacCleary called for the ambassador’s reprimand. Defence Secretary John Healey noted NATO’s Article 5 pledge and more than 450 British personnel killed. Other ministers such as Kemi Badenoch and MPs like Simon Hoare and Ben Spencer condemned the remarks as “flat-out nonsense”, stressing respect for those who served.

Political implications

Analysts say the episode could complicate UK–NATO relations and test Labour’s stance toward Trump. A More in Common focus group raised concerns about Trump ties; Lib Dems warned of reputational damage; Unison cautioned against party control dynamics, touching Burnham’s return to Parliament.

What happens next

Today’s schedule includes an 11:30 lobby briefing and ongoing commentary from health and defence ministers. Keir Starmer may raise the issue in future conversations with the US, while public opinion largely supports backing those who served in Afghanistan.